Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2010.08053

QDLC -- The Quantum Development Life Cycle

Nivedita Dey·Mrityunjay Ghosh·Subhra Samir kundu·Amlan Chakrabarti
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The magnificence grandeur of quantum computing lies in the inherent nature of quantum particles to exhibit true parallelism, which can be realized by indubitably fascinating theories of quantum physics. The possibilities opened by quantum computation (QC) is no where analogous to any classical simulation as quantum computers can efficiently simulate the complex dynamics of strongly correlated inter-facial systems. But, unfolding mysteries and leading to revolutionary breakthroughs in quantum computing are often challenged by lack of research and development potential in developing qubits with longer coherence interval, scaling qubit count, incorporating quantum error correction to name a few. Putting the first footstep into explorative quantum research by researchers and developers is also inherently ambiguous - due to lack of definitive steps in building up a quantum enabled customized computing stack. Difference in behavioral pattern of underlying system, early-stage noisy device, implementation barriers and performance metric cause hindrance in full adoption of existing classical SDLC suites for quantum product development. This in turn, necessitates to devise systematic and cost-effective techniques to quantum software development through a Quantum Development Life Cycle (QDLC) model, specifying the distinguished features and functionalities of quantum feasibility study, quantum requirement specification, quantum system design, quantum software coding and implementation, quantum testing and quantum software quality management.

Explore related subjects

cs.ET

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nivedita Dey, Mrityunjay Ghosh, Subhra Samir kundu, Amlan Chakrabarti. 2020-10-15. QDLC -- The Quantum Development Life Cycle. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Grid to Chip: Power Architecture, Stability, and Flexibility of AI Data Centers

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) computing is transforming data centers into large, dynamic electrical loads. Their deployment is primarily constrained by energy availability and grid-connection capacity, which is further aggravated by the ability of power-delivery architectures, control systems, and computing workloads to operate reliably during fast grid disturbances. This article presents a technological perspective on AI data centers as grid-interactive computing systems. First, it reviews grid-integration bottlenecks, evolving connection policies, grid-code requirements, which has fostered new technological trends via spatio-temporal flexibility available through workload orchestration, cooling systems, on-site resources, and energy storage. Second, it maps the evolution of power-delivery architectures from medium-voltage grid interfaces to chip-level, discussing higher-voltage DC distribution, solid-state transformers, wide-bandgap devices, advanced chip-level power delivery, and liquid cooling. Third, it establishes a three-level stability framework spanning rack-level DC-bus dynamics, facility-level converter interactions, and system-level grid-coupled behavior. The framework connects dominant instability mechanisms, including constant power load effects, impedance interactions, forced oscillations, and operating-mode transitions, with suitable modeling, assessment, and mitigation approaches. Synthesizing these topics, this article highlights grid-to-chip co-design as a central requirement for scalable AI infrastructure, linking computing workloads, power-delivery systems, energy buffers, and grid operation.

cs.ET↗
arXiv2026

A Time-Based Readout for Vector-Matrix Multiplication in Fully Analog Memristive SNNs

Artificial neural networks rely on vector-matrix multiplications (VMMs), whose implementation in von Neumann architectures is dominated by costly data movement between memory and processing units. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) mitigate this bottleneck by performing in-memory, analog VMMs using memristive crossbar arrays. However, conventional current-mode readout circuits incur significant area and power overhead. This work proposes a fully analog readout architecture based on voltage-to-time conversion of the VMM output. By sensing the column voltage, the proposed approach avoids current-mode summing and scaling circuitry, improving area and energy efficiency. Post-layout simulations of a 10x1 SNN implemented in a 130 nm CMOS technology validate the proposed architecture, while application to a trained 64x10 SNN for digit classification further demonstrates its feasibility for SNN inference.

cs.ET↗
arXiv2026

Fractional-order hardware for neuromorphic computing: Is the order really the problem?

Does a neuromorphic system need a true power-law memory kernel, and if so, can anyone build one? Neuromorphic systems process signals spanning many timescales at once, from milliseconds to tens of seconds. Integer-order circuits buy each additional timescale with an additional state variable. Fractional-order dynamics offer a different bargain: one operator whose power-law kernel carries a continuum of timescales, tuned by one parameter, the order alpha. A fractional derivative is non-local, so evaluating it costs storage and arithmetic that grow with the retained history, where an integer-order derivative costs a constant. This review organizes the hardware literature around that cost. We derive the retained history needed to hold the truncation error below a tolerance epsilon, show that it scales as epsilon^(-1/alpha), and set beside it a second and independent limit on the direct form: in fixed point the weights themselves underflow, so word length caps the usable history however long the buffer is. The two limits move at very different rates with the order, and where they cross decides whether a word length can serve an order at all. We use both to sort published hardware into three strategies, note a fourth the numerical literature has developed and this hardware has not, and survey digital, analog and device work. Along the way we ask whether the field is worried about the right obstacle. It is not. Fabricated constant-phase devices already span the orders two groups identify as task-optimal, so the order gap has largely closed, leaving a residual gap near 0.1 and at the lower order describing cortical adaptation. What remains is a frequency-band gap of about three decades at the low end. That corner is not empty, since double-layer electrodes work there, but every device in it is discrete, and no integrable thin-film element has been characterized there.

cs.ET↗