SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2010.10408

A Faster Parameterized Algorithm for Temporal Matching

Abstract

A temporal graph is a sequence of graphs (called layers) over the same vertex set -- describing a graph topology which is subject to discrete changes over time. A $\Delta$-temporal matching $M$ is a set of time edges $(e,t)$ (an edge $e$ paired up with a point in time $t$) such that for all distinct time edges $(e,t),(e',t') \in M$ we have that $e$ and $e'$ do not share an endpoint, or the time-labels $t$ and $t'$ are at least $\Delta$ time units apart. Mertzios et al. [STACS '20] provided a $2^{O(\Delta\nu)}\cdot |{\mathcal G}|^{O(1)}$-time algorithm to compute the maximum size of a $\Delta$-temporal matching in a temporal graph $\mathcal G$, where $|\mathcal G|$ denotes the size of $\mathcal G$, and $\nu$ is the $\Delta$-vertex cover number of $\mathcal G$. The $\Delta$-vertex cover number is the minimum number $\nu$ such that the classical vertex cover number of the union of any $\Delta$ consecutive layers of the temporal graph is upper-bounded by $\nu$. We show an improved algorithm to compute a $\Delta$-temporal matching of maximum size with a running time of $\Delta^{O(\nu)}\cdot |\mathcal G|$ and hence provide an exponential speedup in terms of $\Delta$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Philipp Zschoche. 2020-10-20. A Faster Parameterized Algorithm for Temporal Matching. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.10408

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS