SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2010.11393

The Efficacy of the Flipped Classroom Technique in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: A Review of the Research

Abstract

The flipped classroom technique has recently been a focus of attention for many math instructors and pedagogical researchers. Although research on the subject has greatly increased in recent years, it is still debated whether the flipped classroom technique can significantly increase the overall success of students in undergraduate math courses. While there have been meta-analyses that consider the efficacy of the technique across university disciplines and within other STEM fields, there has not yet been a systematic review within undergraduate math education. By analyzing the existing research and compiling the quantitative and qualitative data, this paper examines the efficacy of the flipped classroom technique in undergraduate math courses, ranging from introductory calculus to transition-to-proof courses, in regards to students' performance in the classes, perceptions of the technique, and associated self-efficacy. This paper also introduces the current use of the technique and covers successful implementation methods. Additionally, it highlights the flipped classroom technique's potential for improving retention of members of underrepresented groups in math by increasing their sense of belonging as well as discusses the efficacy of the method in early proof-based courses in regards to students' acquisition of sociomathematical norms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Adeli Hutton. 2020-10-22. The Efficacy of the Flipped Classroom Technique in Undergraduate Mathematics Education: A Review of the Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO