SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2011.00977

Constant-Time Dynamic Weight Approximation for Minimum Spanning Forest

Abstract

We give two fully dynamic algorithms that maintain a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation of the weight $M$ of a minimum spanning forest (MSF) of an $n$-node graph $G$ with edges weights in $[1,W]$, for any $\varepsilon>0$. (1) Our deterministic algorithm takes $O({W^2 \log W}/{\varepsilon^3})$ worst-case update time, which is $O(1)$ if both $W$ and $\varepsilon$ are constants. Note that there is a lower bound by Patrascu and Demaine (SIAM J. Comput. 2006) which shows that it takes $\Omega(\log n)$ time per operation to maintain the exact weight of an MSF that holds even in the unweighted case, i.e. for $W=1$. We further show that any deterministic data structure that dynamically maintains the $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate weight of an MSF requires super constant time per operation, if $W\geq (\log n)^{\omega_n(1)}$. (2) Our randomized (Monte-Carlo style) algorithm works with high probability and runs in worst-case $O(\log W/ \varepsilon^{4})$ update time if $W= O({(m^*)^{1/6}}/{\log^{2/3} n})$, where $m^*$ is the minimum number of edges in the graph throughout all the updates. It works even against an adaptive adversary. This implies a randomized algorithm with worst-case $o(\log n)$ update time, whenever $W=\min\{O((m^*)^{1/6}/\log^{2/3} n), 2^{o({\log n})}\}$ and $\varepsilon$ is constant. We complement this result by showing that for any constant $\varepsilon,\alpha>0$ and $W=n^{\alpha}$, any (randomized) data structure that dynamically maintains the weight of an MSF of a graph $G$ with edge weights in $[1,W]$ and $W = \Omega(\varepsilon m^*)$ within a multiplicative factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$ takes $\Omega(\log n)$ time per operation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Monika Henzinger, Pan Peng. 2020-11-02. Constant-Time Dynamic Weight Approximation for Minimum Spanning Forest. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00977

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS