SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2011.04273

An APTAS for Bin Packing with Clique-graph Conflicts

Abstract

We study the following variant of the classic {\em bin packing} problem. Given a set of items of various sizes, partitioned into groups, find a packing of the items in a minimum number of identical (unit-size) bins, such that no two items of the same group are assigned to the same bin. This problem, known as {\em bin packing with clique-graph conflicts}, has natural applications in storing file replicas, security in cloud computing and signal distribution. Our main result is an {\em asymptotic polynomial time approximation scheme (APTAS)} for the problem, improving upon the best known ratio of $2$. %In particular, for any instance $I$ and a fixed $\eps \in (0,1)$, the items are packed in at most $(1+\eps)OPT(I) +1$ bins, where $OPT(I)$ is the minimum number of bins required for packing the instance. As a key tool, we apply a novel {\em Shift \& Swap} technique which generalizes the classic linear shifting technique to scenarios allowing conflicts between items. The major challenge of packing {\em small} items using only a small number of extra bins is tackled through an intricate combination of enumeration and a greedy-based approach that utilizes the rounded solution of a {\em linear program}.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ilan Doron-Arad, Ariel Kulik, Hadas Shachnai. 2020-11-09. An APTAS for Bin Packing with Clique-graph Conflicts. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04273

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS