SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2011.06530

Towards Tight Bounds for Spectral Sparsification of Hypergraphs

Abstract

Cut and spectral sparsification of graphs have numerous applications, including e.g. speeding up algorithms for cuts and Laplacian solvers. These powerful notions have recently been extended to hypergraphs, which are much richer and may offer new applications. However, the current bounds on the size of hypergraph sparsifiers are not as tight as the corresponding bounds for graphs. Our first result is a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a hypergraph on $n$ vertices with maximum hyperedge size $r$, outputs an $\epsilon$-spectral sparsifier with $O^*(nr)$ hyperedges, where $O^*$ suppresses $(\epsilon^{-1} \log n)^{O(1)}$ factors. This size bound improves the two previous bounds: $O^*(n^3)$ [Soma and Yoshida, SODA'19] and $O^*(nr^3)$ [Bansal, Svensson and Trevisan, FOCS'19]. Our main technical tool is a new method for proving concentration of the nonlinear analogue of the quadratic form of the Laplacians for hypergraph expanders. We complement this with lower bounds on the bit complexity of any compression scheme that $(1+\epsilon)$-approximates all the cuts in a given hypergraph, and hence also on the bit complexity of every $\epsilon$-cut/spectral sparsifier. These lower bounds are based on Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs, and a particular instantiation yields an $\Omega(nr)$ lower bound on the bit complexity even for fixed constant $\epsilon$. This is tight up to polylogarithmic factors in $n$, due to recent hypergraph cut sparsifiers of [Chen, Khanna and Nagda, FOCS'20]. Finally, for directed hypergraphs, we present an algorithm that computes an $\epsilon$-spectral sparsifier with $O^*(n^2r^3)$ hyperarcs, where $r$ is the maximum size of a hyperarc. For small $r$, this improves over $O^*(n^3)$ known from [Soma and Yoshida, SODA'19], and is getting close to the trivial lower bound of $\Omega(n^2)$ hyperarcs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Kapralov, Robert Krauthgamer, Jakab Tardos, Yuichi Yoshida. 2020-11-12. Towards Tight Bounds for Spectral Sparsification of Hypergraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06530

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS