Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.08999

PassGoodPool: Joint Passengers and Goods Fleet Management with Reinforcement Learning aided Pricing, Matching, and Route Planning

Kaushik Manchella·Marina Haliem·Vaneet Aggarwal·Bharat Bhargava
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The ubiquitous growth of mobility-on-demand services for passenger and goods delivery has brought various challenges and opportunities within the realm of transportation systems. As a result, intelligent transportation systems are being developed to maximize operational profitability, user convenience, and environmental sustainability. The growth of last mile deliveries alongside ridesharing calls for an efficient and cohesive system that transports both passengers and goods. Existing methods address this using static routing methods considering neither the demands of requests nor the transfer of goods between vehicles during route planning. In this paper, we present a dynamic and demand aware fleet management framework for combined goods and passenger transportation that is capable of (1) Involving both passengers and drivers in the decision-making process by allowing drivers to negotiate to a mutually suitable price, and passengers to accept/reject, (2) Matching of goods to vehicles, and the multi-hop transfer of goods, (3) Dynamically generating optimal routes for each vehicle considering demand along their paths, based on the insertion cost which then determines the matching, (4) Dispatching idle vehicles to areas of anticipated high passenger and goods demand using Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL), (5) Allowing for distributed inference at each vehicle while collectively optimizing fleet objectives. Our proposed model is deployable independently within each vehicle as this minimizes computational costs associated with the growth of distributed systems and democratizes decision-making to each individual. Simulations on a variety of vehicle types, goods, and passenger utility functions show the effectiveness of our approach as compared to other methods that do not consider combined load transportation or dynamic multi-hop route planning.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kaushik Manchella, Marina Haliem, Vaneet Aggarwal, Bharat Bhargava. 2020-11-17. PassGoodPool: Joint Passengers and Goods Fleet Management with Reinforcement Learning aided Pricing, Matching, and Route Planning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.08999

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗