SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2011.11098

A Game Theoretic Analysis for Cooperative Smart Farming

Abstract

The application of Internet of Things (IoT) and Machine Learning (ML) to the agricultural industry has enabled the development and creation of smart farms and precision agriculture. The growth in the number of smart farms and potential cooperation between these farms has given rise to the Cooperative Smart Farming (CSF) where different connected farms collaborate with each other and share data for their mutual benefit. This data sharing through CSF has various advantages where individual data from separate farms can be aggregated by ML models and be used to produce actionable outputs which then can be utilized by all the farms in CSFs. This enables farms to gain better insights for enhancing desired outputs, such as crop yield, managing water resources and irrigation schedules, as well as better seed applications. However, complications may arise in CSF when some of the farms do not transfer high-quality data and rather rely on other farms to feed ML models. Another possibility is the presence of rogue farms in CSFs that want to snoop on other farms without actually contributing any data. In this paper, we analyze the behavior of farms participating in CSFs using game theory approach, where each farm is motivated to maximize its profit. We first present the problem of defective farms in CSFs due to lack of better data, and then propose a ML framework that segregates farms and automatically assign them to an appropriate CSF cluster based on the quality of data they provide. Our proposed model rewards the farms supplying better data and penalize the ones that do not provide required data or are malicious in nature, thus, ensuring the model integrity and better performance all over while solving the defective farms problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Deepti Gupta, Paras Bhatt, Smriti Bhatt. 2020-11-22. A Game Theoretic Analysis for Cooperative Smart Farming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.11098

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT