Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.11485

Doubly weighted M-estimation for nonrandom assignment and missing outcomes

Akanksha Negi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper proposes a new class of M-estimators that double weight for the twin problems of nonrandom treatment assignment and missing outcomes, both of which are common issues in the treatment effects literature. The proposed class is characterized by a `robustness' property, which makes it resilient to parametric misspecification in either a conditional model of interest (for example, mean or quantile function) or the two weighting functions. As leading applications, the paper discusses estimation of two specific causal parameters; average and quantile treatment effects (ATE, QTEs), which can be expressed as functions of the doubly weighted estimator, under misspecification of the framework's parametric components. With respect to the ATE, this paper shows that the proposed estimator is doubly robust even in the presence of missing outcomes. Finally, to demonstrate the estimator's viability in empirical settings, it is applied to Calonico and Smith (2017)'s reconstructed sample from the National Supported Work training program.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Akanksha Negi. 2020-11-23. Doubly weighted M-estimation for nonrandom assignment and missing outcomes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.11485

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM↗