State Feedback Stabilization of Generic Logic Systems via Ledley Antecedence Solution

Yingzhe Jia; Daizhan Cheng; Jun-e Feng

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2011.13103

State Feedback Stabilization of Generic Logic Systems via Ledley Antecedence Solution

Yingzhe Jia·Daizhan Cheng·Jun-e Feng

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, the application of Ledley antecedence solutions in designing state feedback stabilizers of generic logic systems has been proposed. To make the method feasible, two modifications are made to the original Ledley antecedence solution theory: (i) the preassigned logical functions have been extended from being a set of equations to an admissible set; (ii) the domain of arguments has been extended from the whole state space to a restricted subset. In the proposed method, state feedback controls are considered as a set of extended Ledley antecedence solutions for a designed iterative admissible sets over their corresponding restricted subsets. Based on this, an algorithm has been proposed to verify the solvability, and simultaneously to provide all possible state feedback stabilizers when the problem is solvable. All stabilizers are optimal, which stabilize the logic systems from any initial state to the destination state/state set in the shortest time. The method is firstly demonstrated on Boolean control networks to achieve point stabilization. Then, with some minor modifications, the proposed method is also proven to be applicable to set stabilization problems. Finally, it is shown that in $k$-valued and mix-valued logical systems, the proposed method remains effective.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Yingzhe Jia, Daizhan Cheng, Jun-e Feng. 2020-11-26. State Feedback Stabilization of Generic Logic Systems via Ledley Antecedence Solution. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗

arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗