Better Fewer but Better: Community Search with Outliers

Francesco Bonchi; Lorenzo Severini; Mauro Sozio

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2012.00356

Better Fewer but Better: Community Search with Outliers

Francesco Bonchi·Lorenzo Severini·Mauro Sozio

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a set of vertices in a network, that we believe are of interest for the application under analysis, community search is the problem of producing a subgraph potentially explaining the relationships existing among the vertices of interest. In practice this means that the solution should add some vertices to the query ones, so to create a connected subgraph that exhibits some "cohesiveness" property. This problem has received increasing attention in recent years: while several cohesiveness functions have been studied, the bulk of the literature looks for a solution subgraphs containing all the query vertices. However, in many exploratory analyses we might only have a reasonable belief about the vertices of interest: if only one of them is not really related to the others, forcing the solution to include all of them might hide the existence of much more cohesive and meaningful subgraphs, that we could have found by allowing the solution to detect and drop the outlier vertex. In this paper we study the problem of community search with outliers, where we are allowed to drop up to $k$ query vertices, with $k$ being an input parameter. We consider three of the most used measures of cohesiveness: the minimum degree, the diameter of the subgraph and the maximum distance with a query vertex. By optimizing one and using one of the others as a constraint we obtain three optimization problems: we study their hardness and we propose different exact and approximation algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Francesco Bonchi, Lorenzo Severini, Mauro Sozio. 2020-12-01. Better Fewer but Better: Community Search with Outliers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗