Uniform Capacitated Facility Location Problems with Penalties/Outliers

Rajni Dabas; Neelima Gupta

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2012.07135

Uniform Capacitated Facility Location Problems with Penalties/Outliers

Rajni Dabas·Neelima Gupta

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we present a framework to design approximation algorithms for capacitated facility location problems with penalties/outliers using LP-rounding. Primal-dual technique, which has been particularly successful in dealing with outliers and penalties, has not been very successful in dealing with capacities. On the other hand, no primal-dual solution has been able to break the hardness of capacitated facility location problem(CFLP). LP-rounding techniques had also not been very successful in dealing with capacities until a recent work by Grover et al. \cite{GroverGKP18}. Their constant factor approximation violating the capacities by a small factor ($1 + \epsilon$) is promising while dealing with capacities.Though LP-rounding has not been very promising while dealing with penalties and outliers, we successfully apply it to deal with them along with capacities. That is, our results are obtained by rounding the solution to the natural LP once again exhibiting the power of LP-rounding technique. Solutions obtained by LP-rounding are easy to integrate with other LP-based algorithms.In this paper, we apply our framework to obtain first constant factor approximations for capacitated facility location problem with outlier (CFLPO) and capacitated $k$-facility location problem with penalty(C$k$FLPP) for hard uniform capacities using LP-rounding. Our solutions incur slight violations in capacities, ($1 + \epsilon$) for the problems without cardinality($k$) constraint and ($2 + \epsilon$) for the problems with the cardinality constraint. For the outlier variant, we also incur a small loss ($1 + \epsilon$) in outliers. Due to the hardness of the underlying problems, the violations are inevitable. Thus we achieve the best possible by rounding the solution of natural LP for these problems. To the best of our knowledge, no results are known for CFLPO and C$k$FLPP.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Rajni Dabas, Neelima Gupta. 2020-12-13. Uniform Capacitated Facility Location Problems with Penalties/Outliers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.07135

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗