SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2012.11406

Knowledge as Invariance -- History and Perspectives of Knowledge-augmented Machine Learning

Abstract

Research in machine learning is at a turning point. While supervised deep learning has conquered the field at a breathtaking pace and demonstrated the ability to solve inference problems with unprecedented accuracy, it still does not quite live up to its name if we think of learning as the process of acquiring knowledge about a subject or problem. Major weaknesses of present-day deep learning models are, for instance, their lack of adaptability to changes of environment or their incapability to perform other kinds of tasks than the one they were trained for. While it is still unclear how to overcome these limitations, one can observe a paradigm shift within the machine learning community, with research interests shifting away from increasing the performance of highly parameterized models to exceedingly specific tasks, and towards employing machine learning algorithms in highly diverse domains. This research question can be approached from different angles. For instance, the field of Informed AI investigates the problem of infusing domain knowledge into a machine learning model, by using techniques such as regularization, data augmentation or post-processing. On the other hand, a remarkable number of works in the recent years has focused on developing models that by themselves guarantee a certain degree of versatility and invariance with respect to the domain or problem at hand. Thus, rather than investigating how to provide domain-specific knowledge to machine learning models, these works explore methods that equip the models with the capability of acquiring the knowledge by themselves. This white paper provides an introduction and discussion of this emerging field in machine learning research. To this end, it reviews the role of knowledge in machine learning, and discusses its relation to the concept of invariance, before providing a literature review of the field.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexander Sagel, Amit Sahu, Stefan Matthes, Holger Pfeifer, Tianming Qiu, Harald Rueß, Hao Shen, Julian Wörmann. 2020-12-21. Knowledge as Invariance -- History and Perspectives of Knowledge-augmented Machine Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11406

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG