arXiv · 2012.13378
Parallelism versus Latency in Simplified Successive-Cancellation Decoding of Polar Codes
Abstract
This paper characterizes the latency of the simplified successive-cancellation (SSC) decoding scheme for polar codes under hardware resource constraints. In particular, when the number of processing elements $P$ that can perform SSC decoding operations in parallel is limited, as is the case in practice, the latency of SSC decoding is $O\left(N^{1-1/\mu}+\frac{N}{P}\log_2\log_2\frac{N}{P}\right)$, where $N$ is the block length of the code and $\mu$ is the scaling exponent of the channel. Three direct consequences of this bound are presented. First, in a fully-parallel implementation where $P=\frac{N}{2}$, the latency of SSC decoding is $O\left(N^{1-1/\mu}\right)$, which is sublinear in the block length. This recovers a result from our earlier work. Second, in a fully-serial implementation where $P=1$, the latency of SSC decoding scales as $O\left(N\log_2\log_2 N\right)$. The multiplicative constant is also calculated: we show that the latency of SSC decoding when $P=1$ is given by $\left(2+o(1)\right) N\log_2\log_2 N$. Third, in a semi-parallel implementation, the smallest $P$ that gives the same latency as that of the fully-parallel implementation is $P=N^{1/\mu}$. The tightness of our bound on SSC decoding latency and the applicability of the foregoing results is validated through extensive simulations.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Seyyed Ali Hashemi, Marco Mondelli, Arman Fazeli, Alexander Vardy, John Cioffi, Andrea Goldsmith. 2020-12-24. Parallelism versus Latency in Simplified Successive-Cancellation Decoding of Polar Codes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.13378
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.