Solving Cut-Problems in Quadratic Time for Graphs With Bounded Treewidth

Hauke Brinkop; Klaus Jansen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.00694

Solving Cut-Problems in Quadratic Time for Graphs With Bounded Treewidth

Hauke Brinkop·Klaus Jansen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the problem (Unweighted) Max-Cut we are given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and asked for a set $S \subseteq V$ such that the number of edges from $S$ to $V \setminus S$ is maximal. In this paper we consider an even harder problem: (Weighted) Max-Bisection. Here we are given an undirected graph $G = (V,E)$ and a weight function $w \colon E \to \mathbb Q_{>0}$ and the task is to find a set $S \subseteq V$ such that (i) the sum of the weights of edges from $S$ is maximal; and (ii) $S$ contains $\left\lceil{\frac{n}{2}}\right\rceil$ vertices (where $n = \lvert V\rvert$). We design a framework that allows to solve this problem in time $\mathcal O(2^t n^2)$ if a tree decomposition of width $t$ is given as part of the input. This improves the previously best running time for Max-Bisection of [DBLP:journals/tcs/HanakaKS21] by a factor $t^2$. Under common hardness assumptions, neither the dependence on $t$ in the exponent nor the dependence on $n$ can be reduced [DBLP:journals/tcs/HanakaKS21,DBLP:journals/jcss/EibenLM21,DBLP:journals/talg/LokshtanovMS18]. Our framework can be applied to other cut problems like Min-Edge-Expansion, Sparsest-Cut, Densest-Cut, $\beta$-Balanced-Min-Cut, and Min-Bisection. It also works in the setting with arbitrary weights and directed edges.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hauke Brinkop, Klaus Jansen. 2021-01-03. Solving Cut-Problems in Quadratic Time for Graphs With Bounded Treewidth. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00694

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗