SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2101.04381

"It is like egg": Paul Lorenzen and the collapse of proofs of consistency

Abstract

Paul Lorenzen, mathematician and philosopher of the 20th century, mentions October 1947 as the date of a crisis in his mathematical and philosophical investigations. An autograph dated 15 October 1947 documents this crisis. This article proposes a translation and a commentary of it and sketches the circumstances of its writing on the base of his correspondence with Paul Bernays. A letter from Lorenzen to Carl Friedrich Gethmann dated 14 January 1988 carves out the story of this crisis by showing how he soaks up the indications of his correspondents and transmutes them into an absolutely original research. Paul Lorenzen, math{\'e}maticien et philosophe du 20e si{\`e}cle, {\'e}voque le mois d'octobre 1947 comme la date d'une c{\'e}sure dans ses investigations tant math{\'e}matiques que philosophiques. Un {\'e}crit autographe dat{\'e} du 15 octobre 1947 marque cette c{\'e}sure. Cet article en propose une traduction et un commentaire ligne {\`a} ligne, puis esquisse les circonstances de son {\'e}criture sur la base de la correspondance avec Paul Bernays, figure tut{\'e}laire de la logique math{\'e}matique et l'un de ses principaux interlocuteurs {\`a} cette {\'e}poque, {\`a} l'instar de Heinrich Scholz et Oskar Becker. Une lettre de Lorenzen {\`a} Carl Friedrich Gethmann dat{\'e}e du 14 janvier 1988 {\'e}toffe le r{\'e}cit de cette c{\'e}sure en montrant comment il s'impr{\`e}gne des indications que lui fournissent ses correspondants pour les transmuter en une recherche absolument originale.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefan Neuwirth. 2021-01-12. "It is like egg": Paul Lorenzen and the collapse of proofs of consistency. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04381

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO