Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.04770

Forecasting blood sugar levels in Diabetes with univariate algorithms

Ignacio Rodriguez
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AI procedures joined with wearable gadgets can convey exact transient blood glucose level forecast models. Also, such models can learn customized glucose-insulin elements dependent on the sensor information gathered by observing a few parts of the physiological condition and every day movement of a person. Up to this point, the predominant methodology for creating information driven forecast models was to gather "however much information as could be expected" to help doctors and patients ideally change treatment. The goal of this work was to examine the base information assortment, volume, and speed needed to accomplish exact individual driven diminutive term expectation models. We built up a progression of these models utilizing distinctive AI time arrangement guaging strategies that are appropriate for execution inside a wearable processor. We completed a broad aloof patient checking concentrate in genuine conditions to fabricate a strong informational collection. The examination included a subset of type-1 diabetic subjects wearing a glimmer glucose checking framework. We directed a relative quantitative assessment of the presentation of the created information driven expectation models and comparing AI methods. Our outcomes show that precise momentary forecast can be accomplished by just checking interstitial glucose information over a brief timeframe and utilizing a low examining recurrence. The models created can anticipate glucose levels inside a 15-minute skyline with a normal mistake as low as 15.43 mg/dL utilizing just 24 memorable qualities gathered inside a time of 6 hours, and by expanding the inspecting recurrence to incorporate 72 qualities, the normal blunder is limited to 10.15 mg/dL. Our forecast models are reasonable for execution inside a wearable gadget, requiring the base equipment necessities while simultaneously accomplishing high expectation precision.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ignacio Rodriguez. 2021-01-12. Forecasting blood sugar levels in Diabetes with univariate algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.04770

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗