Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.05348

Gaussian Mixture Graphical Lasso with Application to Edge Detection in Brain Networks

Hang Yin·Xinyue Liu·Xiangnan Kong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sparse inverse covariance estimation (i.e., edge de-tection) is an important research problem in recent years, wherethe goal is to discover the direct connections between a set ofnodes in a networked system based upon the observed nodeactivities. Existing works mainly focus on unimodal distributions,where it is usually assumed that the observed activities aregenerated from asingleGaussian distribution (i.e., one graph).However, this assumption is too strong for many real-worldapplications. In many real-world applications (e.g., brain net-works), the node activities usually exhibit much more complexpatterns that are difficult to be captured by one single Gaussiandistribution. In this work, we are inspired by Latent DirichletAllocation (LDA) [4] and consider modeling the edge detectionproblem as estimating a mixture ofmultipleGaussian distribu-tions, where each corresponds to a separate sub-network. Toaddress this problem, we propose a novel model called GaussianMixture Graphical Lasso (MGL). It learns the proportionsof signals generated by each mixture component and theirparameters iteratively via an EM framework. To obtain moreinterpretable networks, MGL imposes a special regularization,called Mutual Exclusivity Regularization (MER), to minimize theoverlap between different sub-networks. MER also addresses thecommon issues in read-world data sets,i.e., noisy observationsand small sample size. Through the extensive experiments onsynthetic and real brain data sets, the results demonstrate thatMGL can effectively discover multiple connectivity structuresfrom the observed node activities

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hang Yin, Xinyue Liu, Xiangnan Kong. 2021-01-13. Gaussian Mixture Graphical Lasso with Application to Edge Detection in Brain Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05348

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗