arXiv · 2101.06506
Precision dispersive approaches versus unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory for the lightest scalar resonances $\sigma/f_0(500)$ and $\kappa/K_0^*(700)$
Abstract
For several decades, the $\sigma/f_0(500)$ and $\kappa/K_0^*(700)$ resonances have been subject to long-standing debate. Both their existence and properties were controversial until very recently. In this tutorial review we compare model-independent dispersive and analytic techniques versus unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory, when applied to the lightest scalar mesons $\sigma/f_0(500)$ and $\kappa/K_0^*(700)$. Generically, the former have settled the long-standing controversy about the existence of these states, providing a precise determination of their parameters, whereas unitarization of chiral effective theories allows us to understand their nature, spectroscopic classification and dependence on QCD parameters. Here we review in a pedagogical way their uses, advantages and caveats.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
J. R. Peláez, A. Rodas, J. Ruiz de Elvira. 2021-01-16. Precision dispersive approaches versus unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory for the lightest scalar resonances $\sigma/f_0(500)$ and $\kappa/K_0^*(700)$. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-021-00142-9
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.