SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2101.08637

Improved Algorithms for the General Exact Satisfiability Problem

Abstract

The Exact Satisfiability problem asks if we can find a satisfying assignment to each clause such that exactly one literal in each clause is assigned $1$, while the rest are all assigned $0$. We can generalise this problem further by defining that a $C^j$ clause is solved iff exactly $j$ of the literals in the clause are $1$ and all others are $0$. We now introduce the family of Generalised Exact Satisfiability problems called G$i$XSAT as the problem to check whether a given instance consisting of $C^j$ clauses with $j \in \{0,1,\ldots,i\}$ for each clause has a satisfying assignment. In this paper, we present faster exact polynomial space algorithms, using a nonstandard measure, to solve G$i$XSAT, for $i\in \{2,3,4\}$, in $O(1.3674^n)$ time, $O(1.5687^n)$ time and $O(1.6545^n)$ time, respectively, using polynomial space, where $n$ is the number of variables. This improves the current state of the art for polynomial space algorithms from $O(1.4203^n)$ time for G$2$XSAT by Zhou, Jiang and Yin and from $O(1.6202^n)$ time for G$3$XSAT by Dahll\"of and from $O(1.6844^n)$ time for G$4$XSAT which was by Dahll\"of as well. In addition, we present faster exact algorithms solving G$2$XSAT, G$3$XSAT and G$4$XSAT in $O(1.3188^n)$ time, $O(1.3407^n)$ time and $O(1.3536^n)$ time respectively at the expense of using exponential space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gordon Hoi, Frank Stephan. 2021-01-21. Improved Algorithms for the General Exact Satisfiability Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08637

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS