Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.10742

A Tight Lower Bound for Edge-Disjoint Paths on Planar DAGs

Rajesh Chitnis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

(see paper for full abstract) We show that the Edge-Disjoint Paths problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by the number $k$ of terminal pairs, even when the input graph is a planar directed acyclic graph (DAG). This answers a question of Slivkins (ESA '03, SIDMA '10). Moreover, under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), we show that there is no $f(k)\cdot n^{o(k)}$ algorithm for Edge-Disjoint Paths on planar DAGs, where $k$ is the number of terminal pairs, $n$ is the number of vertices and $f$ is any computable function. Our hardness holds even if both the maximum in-degree and maximum out-degree of the graph are at most $2$. Our result shows that the $n^{O(k)}$ algorithm of Fortune et al. (TCS '80) for Edge-Disjoint Paths on DAGs is asymptotically tight, even if we add an extra restriction of planarity. As a special case of our result, we obtain that Edge-Disjoint Paths on planar directed graphs is W[1]-hard parameterized by the number $k$ of terminal pairs. This answers a question of Cygan et al. (FOCS '13) and Schrijver (pp. 417-444, Building Bridges II, '19), and completes the landscape of the parameterized complexity status of edge and vertex versions of the Disjoint Paths problem on planar directed and planar undirected graphs.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Rajesh Chitnis. 2021-01-26. A Tight Lower Bound for Edge-Disjoint Paths on Planar DAGs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10742

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗