Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2101.12442

Finding the Sweet Spot for Data Anonymization: A Mechanism Design Perspective

Abdelrahman Eldosouky·Tapadhir Das·Anuraag Kotra·Shamik Sengupta
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Data sharing between different organizations is an essential process in today's connected world. However, recently there were many concerns about data sharing as sharing sensitive information can jeopardize users' privacy. To preserve the privacy, organizations use anonymization techniques to conceal users' sensitive data. However, these techniques are vulnerable to de-anonymization attacks which aim to identify individual records within a dataset. In this paper, a two-tier mathematical framework is proposed for analyzing and mitigating the de-anonymization attacks, by studying the interactions between sharing organizations, data collector, and a prospective attacker. In the first level, a game-theoretic model is proposed to enable sharing organizations to optimally select their anonymization levels for k-anonymization under two potential attacks: background-knowledge attack and homogeneity attack. In the second level, a contract-theoretic model is proposed to enable the data collector to optimally reward the organizations for their data. The formulated problems are studied under single-time sharing and repeated sharing scenarios. Different Nash equilibria for the proposed game and the optimal solution of the contract-based problem are analytically derived for both scenarios. Simulation results show that the organizations can optimally select their anonymization levels, while the data collector can benefit from incentivizing the organizations to share their data.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Abdelrahman Eldosouky, Tapadhir Das, Anuraag Kotra, Shamik Sengupta. 2021-01-29. Finding the Sweet Spot for Data Anonymization: A Mechanism Design Perspective. https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12442

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗