SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2102.06613

Improved LP-based Approximation Algorithms for Facility Location with Hard Capacities

Abstract

The Capacitated Facility Location (CFL), a long-standing classic problem with intriguing approximability and literature dated back to the 90s, is considered. Following the open question posted in [Williamson and Shmoys, 2011] and the notable work due to [An et al., FOCS~2014], we present an LP-based approximation algorithm with a guarantee of $(10+\sqrt{67})/2 \approx 9.0927$, a significant improvement upon the previous LP-based ratio of $288$ due to An et al. in 2014. Our contribution for this part is a simple and elegant rounding algorithm that brings clear insights for the MFN relaxation and the CFL problem. For CFL with cardinality facility cost (CFL-CFC), we present an LP-based $4$-approximation algorithm, which improves upon the decades-old ratio of 5 due to Levi et al. that ages up since 2004. Prior to our work, it was not clear whether or not LP-based methods can be used to provide a guarantee better than 5 for the CFL problem, even for restricted versions of this problem, for which natural LPs are already known to have small integrality gaps. Our rounding algorithm provides the first affirmative answer on the case with cadinality facility cost.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mong-Jen Kao. 2021-02-12. Improved LP-based Approximation Algorithms for Facility Location with Hard Capacities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.06613

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS