SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2102.08476

Maximum Coverage in the Data Stream Model: Parameterized and Generalized

Abstract

We present algorithms for the Max-Cover and Max-Unique-Cover problems in the data stream model. The input to both problems are $m$ subsets of a universe of size $n$ and a value $k\in [m]$. In Max-Cover, the problem is to find a collection of at most $k$ sets such that the number of elements covered by at least one set is maximized. In Max-Unique-Cover, the problem is to find a collection of at most $k$ sets such that the number of elements covered by exactly one set is maximized. Our goal is to design single-pass algorithms that use space that is sublinear in the input size. Our main algorithmic results are: If the sets have size at most $d$, there exist single-pass algorithms using $\tilde{O}(d^{d+1} k^d)$ space that solve both problems exactly. This is optimal up to polylogarithmic factors for constant $d$. If each element appears in at most $r$ sets, we present single pass algorithms using $\tilde{O}(k^2 r/\epsilon^3)$ space that return a $1+\epsilon$ approximation in the case of Max-Cover. We also present a single-pass algorithm using slightly more memory, i.e., $\tilde{O}(k^3 r/\epsilon^{4})$ space, that $1+\epsilon$ approximates Max-Unique-Cover. In contrast to the above results, when $d$ and $r$ are arbitrary, any constant pass $1+\epsilon$ approximation algorithm for either problem requires $\Omega(\epsilon^{-2}m)$ space but a single pass $O(\epsilon^{-2}mk)$ space algorithm exists. In fact any constant-pass algorithm with an approximation better than $e/(e-1)$ and $e^{1-1/k}$ for Max-Cover and Max-Unique-Cover respectively requires $\Omega(m/k^2)$ space when $d$ and $r$ are unrestricted. En route, we also obtain an algorithm for a parameterized version of the streaming Set-Cover problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrew McGregor, David Tench, Hoa T. Vu. 2021-02-16. Maximum Coverage in the Data Stream Model: Parameterized and Generalized. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08476

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS