SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2102.10711

Accelerated Sim-to-Real Deep Reinforcement Learning: Learning Collision Avoidance from Human Player

Abstract

This paper presents a sensor-level mapless collision avoidance algorithm for use in mobile robots that map raw sensor data to linear and angular velocities and navigate in an unknown environment without a map. An efficient training strategy is proposed to allow a robot to learn from both human experience data and self-exploratory data. A game format simulation framework is designed to allow the human player to tele-operate the mobile robot to a goal and human action is also scored using the reward function. Both human player data and self-playing data are sampled using prioritized experience replay algorithm. The proposed algorithm and training strategy have been evaluated in two different experimental configurations: \textit{Environment 1}, a simulated cluttered environment, and \textit{Environment 2}, a simulated corridor environment, to investigate the performance. It was demonstrated that the proposed method achieved the same level of reward using only 16\% of the training steps required by the standard Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) method in Environment 1 and 20\% of that in Environment 2. In the evaluation of 20 random missions, the proposed method achieved no collision in less than 2~h and 2.5~h of training time in the two Gazebo environments respectively. The method also generated smoother trajectories than DDPG. The proposed method has also been implemented on a real robot in the real-world environment for performance evaluation. We can confirm that the trained model with the simulation software can be directly applied into the real-world scenario without further fine-tuning, further demonstrating its higher robustness than DDPG. The video and code are available: https://youtu.be/BmwxevgsdGc https://github.com/hanlinniu/turtlebot3_ddpg_collision_avoidance

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hanlin Niu, Ze Ji, Farshad Arvin, Barry Lennox, Hujun Yin, Joaquin Carrasco. 2021-02-21. Accelerated Sim-to-Real Deep Reinforcement Learning: Learning Collision Avoidance from Human Player. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10711

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI