SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2103.02981

Theory of Evolutionary Spectra for Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Inference in Possibly Misspecified and Nonstationary Models

Abstract

We develop a theory of evolutionary spectra for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust (HAR) inference when the data may not satisfy second-order stationarity. Nonstationarity is a common feature of economic time series which may arise either from parameter variation or model misspecification. In such a context, the theories that support HAR inference are either not applicable or do not provide accurate approximations. HAR tests standardized by existing long-run variance estimators then may display size distortions and little or no power. This issue can be more severe for methods that use long bandwidths (i.e., fixed-b HAR tests). We introduce a class of nonstationary processes that have a time-varying spectral representation which evolves continuously except at a finite number of time points. We present an extension of the classical heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) estimators that applies two smoothing procedures. One is over the lagged autocovariances, akin to classical HAC estimators, and the other is over time. The latter element is important to flexibly account for nonstationarity. We name them double kernel HAC (DK-HAC) estimators. We show the consistency of the estimators and obtain an optimal DK-HAC estimator under the mean squared error (MSE) criterion. Overall, HAR tests standardized by the proposed DK-HAC estimators are competitive with fixed-b HAR tests, when the latter work well, with regards to size control even when there is strong dependence. Notably, in those empirically relevant situations in which previous HAR tests are undersized and have little or no power, the DK-HAC estimator leads to tests that have good size and power.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alessandro Casini. 2021-03-04. Theory of Evolutionary Spectra for Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Robust Inference in Possibly Misspecified and Nonstationary Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.02981

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM