SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2103.11669

Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival Model

Abstract

The bipartite matching problem in the online and streaming settings has received a lot of attention recently. The classical vertex arrival setting, for which the celebrated Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani (KVV) algorithm achieves a $1-1/e$ approximation, is rather well understood: the $1-1/e$ approximation is optimal in both the online and semi-streaming setting, where the algorithm is constrained to use $n\cdot \log^{O(1)} n$ space. The more challenging the edge arrival model has seen significant progress recently in the online algorithms literature. For the strictly online model (no preemption) approximations better than trivial factor $1/2$ have been ruled out [Gamlath et al'FOCS'19]. For the less restrictive online preemptive model a better than $\frac1{1+\ln 2}$-approximation [Epstein et al'STACS'12] and even a better than $(2-\sqrt{2})$-approximation[Huang et al'SODA'19] have been ruled out. The recent hardness results for online preemptive matching in the edge arrival model are based on the idea of stringing together multiple copies of a KVV hard instance using edge arrivals. In this paper, we show how to implement such constructions using ideas developed in the literature on Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs. As a result, we show that any single pass streaming algorithm that approximates the maximum matching in a bipartite graph with $n$ vertices to a factor better than $\frac1{1+\ln 2}\approx 0.59$ requires $n^{1+\Omega(1/\log\log n)}\gg n \log^{O(1)} n$ space. This gives the first separation between the classical one sided vertex arrival setting and the edge arrival setting in the semi-streaming model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Kapralov. 2021-03-22. Space Lower Bounds for Approximating Maximum Matching in the Edge Arrival Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11669

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS