arXiv · 2104.01736
A Critique of Keum-Bae Cho's Proof that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$
Abstract
In this paper we critique Keum-Bae Cho's proof that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$. This proof relates instances of 3-SAT to indistinguishable binomial decision trees and claims that no polynomial-time algorithm can solve 3-SAT instances represented by these trees. We argue that their proof fails to justify a crucial step, and so the proof does not establish that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Benjamin Carleton, Michael C. Chavrimootoo, Conor Taliancich. 2021-04-05. A Critique of Keum-Bae Cho's Proof that $\mathrm{P} \subsetneq \mathrm{NP}$. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.01736
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.