Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2104.07487

Lipschitz Selectors may not Yield Competitive Algorithms for Convex Body Chasing

C. J. Argue·Anupam Gupta·Marco Molinaro
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The current best algorithms for convex body chasing problem in online algorithms use the notion of the Steiner point of a convex set. In particular, the algorithm which always moves to the Steiner point of the request set is $O(d)$ competitive for nested convex body chasing, and this is optimal among memoryless algorithms [Bubeck et al. 2020]. A memoryless algorithm coincides with the notion of a selector in functional analysis. The Steiner point is noted for being Lipschitz with respect to the Hausdorff metric, and for achieving the minimal Lipschitz constant possible. It is natural to ask whether every selector with this Lipschitz property yields a competitive algorithm for nested convex body chasing. We answer this question in the negative by exhibiting a selector which yields a non-competitive algorithm for nested convex body chasing but is Lipschitz with respect to Hausdorff distance. Furthermore, we show that being Lipschitz with respect to an $L_p$-type analog to the Hausdorff distance is sufficient to guarantee competitiveness if and only if $p=1$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

C. J. Argue, Anupam Gupta, Marco Molinaro. 2021-04-15. Lipschitz Selectors may not Yield Competitive Algorithms for Convex Body Chasing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07487

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗