SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2105.12891

Identification and Estimation of Partial Effects in Nonlinear Semiparametric Panel Models

Abstract

Average partial effects (APEs) are often not point identified in panel models with unrestricted unobserved individual heterogeneity, such as a binary response panel model with fixed effects and logistic errors as a special case. This lack of point identification occurs despite the identification of these models' common coefficients. We provide a unified framework to establish the point identification of various partial effects in a wide class of nonlinear semiparametric models under an index sufficiency assumption on the unobserved heterogeneity, even when the error distribution is unspecified and non-stationary. This assumption does not impose parametric restrictions on the unobserved heterogeneity and idiosyncratic errors. We also present partial identification results when the support condition fails. We then propose three-step semiparametric estimators for APEs, average structural functions, and average marginal effects, and show their consistency and asymptotic normality. Finally, we illustrate our approach in a study of determinants of married women's labor supply.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Laura Liu, Alexandre Poirier, Ji-Liang Shiu. 2021-05-27. Identification and Estimation of Partial Effects in Nonlinear Semiparametric Panel Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12891

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM