Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2105.14590

Statistical Inference from Partially Nominated Sets: An Application to Estimating the Prevalence of Osteoporosis

Zeinab Akbari Ghamsari·Ehsan Zamanzade·Majid Asadi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper focuses on drawing statistical inference based on a novel variant of maxima or minima nomination sampling (NS) designs. These sampling designs are useful for obtaining more representative sample units from the tails of the population distribution using the available auxiliary ranking information. However, one common difficulty in performing NS in practice is that the researcher cannot obtain a nominated sample unless he/she uniquely determines the sample unit with the highest or the lowest rank in each set. To overcome this problem, a variant of NS which is called partial nomination sampling is proposed in which the researcher is allowed to declare that two or more units are tied in the ranks whenever he/she cannot find with high confidence the sample unit with the highest or the lowest rank with high confidence. Based on this sampling design, two asymptotically unbiased estimators are developed for the cumulative distribution function, which are obtained using maximum likelihood and moment-based approaches, and their asymptotic normality is proved. Several numerical studies have shown that the developed estimators have higher relative efficiencies than their counterpart in simple random sampling in analyzing either the upper or the lower tail of the parent distribution. The procedures that we are developed are then implemented on a real dataset from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) to estimate the prevalence of osteoporosis among adult women aged 50 and over. It is shown that in some certain circumstances, the techniques that we have developed require only one-third of the sample size needed in SRS to achieve the desired precision. This results in a considerable reduction of time and cost compared to the standard SRS method.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zeinab Akbari Ghamsari, Ehsan Zamanzade, Majid Asadi. 2021-05-30. Statistical Inference from Partially Nominated Sets: An Application to Estimating the Prevalence of Osteoporosis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14590

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗