SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2106.01036

Ultra-Sparse Near-Additive Emulators

Abstract

Near-additive (aka $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-) emulators and spanners are a fundamental graph-algorithmic construct, with numerous applications for computing approximate shortest paths and related problems in distributed, streaming and dynamic settings. Known constructions of near-additive emulators enable one to trade between their sparsity (i.e., number of edges) and the additive stretch $\beta$. Specifically, for any pair of parameters $\epsilon >0$, $ \kappa=1,2,\dots$, one can have a $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-emulator with $O(n^{1+1/\kappa})$ edges, with $\beta = \left(\frac{\log \kappa}{\epsilon}\right)^{\log \kappa}$. At their sparsest, these emulators employ $c\cdot n$ edges, for some constant $c\geq 2$. We tighten this bound, and show that in fact precisely $n^{1+1/\kappa}$ edges suffice. In particular, our emulators can be \emph{ultra-sparse}, i.e., we can have an emulator with $n+o(n)$ edges and $\beta = \left(\frac{\log {\log n}}{\epsilon }\right)^{{\log {\log n}}(1+o(1))}$. We also devise a distributed deterministic algorithm in the CONGEST model that builds these emulators in low polynomial time (i.e., in $O(n^\rho)$ time, for an arbitrarily small constant parameter $\rho >0$). Finally, we also improve the state-of-the-art distributed deterministic \congest-model construction of $(1+\epsilon,\beta)$-spanners devised in the PODC'19 paper [ElkinM19]. Specifically, the spanners of [ElkinM19] have $O(\beta\cdot n^{1+1/\kappa})$ edges, i.e., at their sparsest they employ $ O\left(\frac{\log {\log n}}{\epsilon }\right)^{{\log {\log n}}}\cdot n$ edges. In this paper, we devise an efficient distributed deterministic CONGEST-model algorithm that builds such spanners with $O(n^{1+1/\kappa})$ edges for $\kappa = O\left(\frac{\log n}{\log ^{(3)}n}\right)$. At their sparsest, these spanners employ only $O(n\cdot {\log {\log n}})$ edges.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Shaked Matar. 2021-06-02. Ultra-Sparse Near-Additive Emulators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01036

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS