Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2106.01963

A Survey on Optimal Transport for Machine Learning: Theory and Applications

Luis Caicedo Torres·Luiz Manella Pereira·M. Hadi Amini
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Optimal Transport (OT) theory has seen an increasing amount of attention from the computer science community due to its potency and relevance in modeling and machine learning. It introduces means that serve as powerful ways to compare probability distributions with each other, as well as producing optimal mappings to minimize cost functions. In this survey, we present a brief introduction and history, a survey of previous work and propose directions of future study. We will begin by looking at the history of optimal transport and introducing the founders of this field. We then give a brief glance into the algorithms related to OT. Then, we will follow up with a mathematical formulation and the prerequisites to understand OT. These include Kantorovich duality, entropic regularization, KL Divergence, and Wassertein barycenters. Since OT is a computationally expensive problem, we then introduce the entropy-regularized version of computing optimal mappings, which allowed OT problems to become applicable in a wide range of machine learning problems. In fact, the methods generated from OT theory are competitive with the current state-of-the-art methods. We follow this up by breaking down research papers that focus on image processing, graph learning, neural architecture search, document representation, and domain adaptation. We close the paper with a small section on future research. Of the recommendations presented, three main problems are fundamental to allow OT to become widely applicable but rely strongly on its mathematical formulation and thus are hardest to answer. Since OT is a novel method, there is plenty of space for new research, and with more and more competitive methods (either on an accuracy level or computational speed level) being created, the future of applied optimal transport is bright as it has become pervasive in machine learning.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Luis Caicedo Torres, Luiz Manella Pereira, M. Hadi Amini. 2021-06-03. A Survey on Optimal Transport for Machine Learning: Theory and Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01963

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗