Oblivious Stacking and MAX $k$-CUT for Circle Graphs

Martin Olsen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2106.02113

Oblivious Stacking and MAX $k$-CUT for Circle Graphs

Martin Olsen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Stacking is an important process within logistics. Some notable examples of items to be stacked are steel bars or steel plates in a steel yard or containers in a container terminal or on a ship. We say that two items are conflicting if their storage time intervals overlap in which case one of the items needs to be rehandled if the items are stored at the same LIFO storage location. We consider the problem of stacking items using $k$ LIFO locations with a minimum number of conflicts between items sharing a location. We present an extremely simple online stacking algorithm that is oblivious to the storage time intervals and storage locations of all other items when it picks a storage location for an item. The risk of assigning the same storage location to two conflicting items is proved to be of the order $1/k^2$ under mild assumptions on the distribution of the storage time intervals for the items. Intuitively, it seems natural to pick a storage location uniformly at random in the oblivious setting implying a risk of $1/k$ so the risk for our algorithm is surprisingly low. Our results can also be expressed within the context of the MAX $k$-CUT problem for circle graphs. The results indicate that circle graphs on average have relatively big $k$-cuts compared to the total number of edges.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.DM

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Martin Olsen. 2021-06-03. Oblivious Stacking and MAX $k$-CUT for Circle Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02113

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗