SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2106.03545

An Improved Approximation Algorithm for the Maximum Weight Independent Set Problem in d-Claw Free Graphs

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the task of computing an independent set of maximum weight in a given $d$-claw free graph $G=(V,E)$ equipped with a positive weight function $w:V\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^+$. In doing so, $d\geq 2$ is considered a constant. The previously best known approximation algorithm for this problem is the local improvement algorithm SquareImp proposed by Berman. It achieves a performance ratio of $\frac{d}{2}+\epsilon$ in time $\mathcal{O}(|V(G)|^{d+1}\cdot(|V(G)|+|E(G)|)\cdot (d-1)^2\cdot \left(\frac{d}{2\epsilon}+1\right)^2)$ for any $\epsilon>0$, which has remained unimproved for the last twenty years. By considering a broader class of local improvements, we obtain an approximation ratio of $\frac{d}{2}-\frac{1}{63,700,992}+\epsilon$ for any $\epsilon>0$ at the cost of an additional factor of $\mathcal{O}(|V(G)|^{(d-1)^2})$ in the running time. In particular, our result implies a polynomial time $\frac{d}{2}$-approximation algorithm. Furthermore, the well-known reduction from the weighted $k$-Set Packing Problem to the Maximum Weight Independent Set Problem in $k+1$-claw free graphs provides a $\frac{k+1}{2}-\frac{1}{63,700,992}+\epsilon$-approximation algorithm for the weighted $k$-Set Packing Problem for any $\epsilon>0$. This improves on the previously best known approximation guarantee of $\frac{k+1}{2}+\epsilon$ originating from the result of Berman.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Meike Neuwohner. 2021-06-07. An Improved Approximation Algorithm for the Maximum Weight Independent Set Problem in d-Claw Free Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03545

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS