SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2106.04179

Deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)$-Approximate Maximum Matching with $\mathsf{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ Passes in the Semi-Streaming Model and Beyond

Abstract

We present a deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate maximum matching algorithm in $\mathsf{poly} 1/\varepsilon$ passes in the semi-streaming model, solving the long-standing open problem of breaking the exponential barrier in the dependence on $1/\varepsilon$. Our algorithm exponentially improves on the well-known randomized $(1/\varepsilon)^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$-pass algorithm from the seminal work by McGregor~[APPROX05], the recent deterministic algorithm by Tirodkar with the same pass complexity~[FSTTCS18]. Up to polynomial factors in $1/\varepsilon$, our work matches the state-of-the-art deterministic $(\log n / \log \log n) \cdot (1/\varepsilon)$-pass algorithm by Ahn and Guha~[TOPC18], that is allowed a dependence on the number of nodes $n$. Our result also makes progress on the Open Problem 60 at sublinear.info. Moreover, we design a general framework that simulates our approach for the streaming setting in other models of computation. This framework requires access to an algorithm computing an $O(1)$-approximate maximum matching and an algorithm for processing disjoint $(\mathsf{poly} 1 / \varepsilon)$-size connected components. Instantiating our framework in $\mathsf{CONGEST}$ yields a $\mathsf{poly}(\log{n}, 1/\varepsilon)$ round algorithm for computing $(1+\varepsilon$)-approximate maximum matching. In terms of the dependence on $1/\varepsilon$, this result improves exponentially state-of-the-art result by Lotker, Patt-Shamir, and Pettie~[LPSP15]. Our framework leads to the same quality of improvement in the context of the Massively Parallel Computation model as well.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Manuela Fischer, Slobodan Mitrović, Jara Uitto. 2021-06-08. Deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)$-Approximate Maximum Matching with $\mathsf{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ Passes in the Semi-Streaming Model and Beyond. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS