countBF: A General-purpose High Accuracy and Space Efficient Counting Bloom Filter

Sabuzima Nayak; Ripon Patgiri

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2106.04364

countBF: A General-purpose High Accuracy and Space Efficient Counting Bloom Filter

Sabuzima Nayak·Ripon Patgiri

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Bloom Filter is a probabilistic data structure for the membership query, and it has been intensely experimented in various fields to reduce memory consumption and enhance a system's performance. Bloom Filter is classified into two key categories: counting Bloom Filter (CBF), and non-counting Bloom Filter. CBF has a higher false positive probability than standard Bloom Filter (SBF), i.e., CBF uses a higher memory footprint than SBF. But CBF can address the issue of the false negative probability. Notably, SBF is also false negative free, but it cannot support delete operations like CBF. To address these issues, we present a novel counting Bloom Filter based on SBF and 2D Bloom Filter, called countBF. countBF uses a modified murmur hash function to enhance its various requirements, which is experimentally evaluated. Our experimental results show that countBF uses $1.96\times$ and $7.85\times$ less memory than SBF and CBF respectively, while preserving lower false positive probability and execution time than both SBF and CBF. The overall accuracy of countBF is $99.999921$, and it proves the superiority of countBF over SBF and CBF. Also, we compare with other state-of-the-art counting Bloom Filters.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sabuzima Nayak, Ripon Patgiri. 2021-06-06. countBF: A General-purpose High Accuracy and Space Efficient Counting Bloom Filter. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04364

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗