arXiv · 2107.01944
Neyman-Pearson Hypothesis Testing, Epistemic Reliability and Pragmatic Value-Laden Asymmetric Error Risks
Abstract
Neyman and Pearson's theory of testing hypotheses does not warrant minimal epistemic reliability: the feature of driving to true conclusions more often than to false ones. The theory does not protect from the possible negative effects of the pragmatic value-laden unequal setting of error probabilities on the theory's epistemic reliability. Most importantly, in the case of a negative impact, no methodological adjustment is available to neutralize it, so in such cases, the discussed pragmatic-value-ladenness of the theory inevitably compromises the goal of attaining truth.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Adam P. Kubiak, Pawel Kawalec, Adam Kiersztyn. 2021-07-05. Neyman-Pearson Hypothesis Testing, Epistemic Reliability and Pragmatic Value-Laden Asymmetric Error Risks. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09541-y
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.