SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2108.00102

Near-Optimal Spanners for General Graphs in (Nearly) Linear Time

Abstract

Let $G = (V,E,w)$ be a weighted undirected graph on $|V| = n$ vertices and $|E| = m$ edges, let $k \ge 1$ be any integer, and let $\epsilon < 1$ be any parameter. We present the following results on fast constructions of spanners with near-optimal sparsity and lightness, which culminate a long line of work in this area. (By near-optimal we mean optimal under Erd\H{o}s' girth conjecture and disregarding the $\epsilon$-dependencies.) - There are (deterministic) algorithms for constructing $(2k-1)(1+\epsilon)$-spanners for $G$ with a near-optimal sparsity of $O(n^{1/k} \log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon))$. The first algorithm can be implemented in the pointer-machine model within time $O(m\alpha(m,n) \log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon) + SORT(m))$, where $\alpha( , )$ is the two-parameter inverse-Ackermann function and $SORT(m)$ is the time needed to sort $m$ integers. The second algorithm can be implemented in the WORD RAM model within time $O(m \log(1/\epsilon)/\epsilon))$. - There is a (deterministic) algorithm for constructing a $(2k-1)(1+\epsilon)$-spanner for $G$ that achieves a near-optimal bound of $O(n^{1/k}\mathrm{poly}(1/\epsilon))$ on both sparsity and lightness. This algorithm can be implemented in the pointer-machine model within time $O(m\alpha(m,n) \mathrm{poly}(1/\epsilon) + SORT(m))$ and in the WORD RAM model within time $O(m \alpha(m,n) \mathrm{poly}(1/\epsilon))$. The previous fastest constructions of $(2k-1)(1+\epsilon)$-spanners with near-optimal sparsity incur a runtime of is $O(\min\{m(n^{1+1/k}) + n\log n,k n^{2+1/k}\})$, even regardless of the lightness. Importantly, the greedy spanner for stretch $2k-1$ has sparsity $O(n^{1/k})$ -- with no $\epsilon$-dependence whatsoever, but its runtime is $O(m(n^{1+1/k} + n\log n))$. Moreover, the state-of-the-art lightness bound of any $(2k-1)$-spanner is poor, even regardless of the sparsity and runtime.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hung Le, Shay Solomon. 2021-07-30. Near-Optimal Spanners for General Graphs in (Nearly) Linear Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS