SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2108.01019

A Framework for Multi-View Classification of Features

Abstract

One of the most important problems in the field of pattern recognition is data classification. Due to the increasing development of technologies introduced in the field of data classification, some of the solutions are still open and need more research. One of the challenging problems in this area is the curse of dimensionality of the feature set of the data classification problem. In solving the data classification problems, when the feature set is too large, typical approaches will not be able to solve the problem. In this case, an approach can be used to partition the feature set into multiple feature sub-sets so that the data classification problem is solved for each of the feature subsets and finally using the ensemble classification, the classification is applied to the entire feature set. In the above-mentioned approach, the partitioning of feature set into feature sub-sets is still an interesting area in the literature of this field. In this research, an innovative framework for multi-view ensemble classification, inspired by the problem of object recognition in the multiple views theory of humans, is proposed. In this method, at first, the collaboration values between the features is calculated using a criterion called the features collaboration criterion. Then, the collaboration graph is formed based on the calculated collaboration values. In the next step, using the community detection method, graph communities are found. The communities are considered as the problem views and the different base classifiers are trained for different views using the views corresponding training data. The multi-view ensemble classifier is then formed by a combination of base classifiers based on the AdaBoost algorithm. The simulation results of the proposed method on the real and synthetic datasets show that the proposed method increases the classification accuracy.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Khalil Taheri, Hadi Moradi, Mostafa Tavassolipour. 2021-08-02. A Framework for Multi-View Classification of Features. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG