On the Fine-Grained Complexity of the Unbounded SubsetSum and the Frobenius Problem

Kim-Manuel Klein

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.05581

On the Fine-Grained Complexity of the Unbounded SubsetSum and the Frobenius Problem

Kim-Manuel Klein

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Consider positive integral solutions $x \in \mathbb{Z}^{n+1}$ to the equation $a_0 x_0 + \ldots + a_n x_n = t$. In the so called unbounded subset sum problem, the objective is to decide whether such a solution exists, whereas in the Frobenius problem, the objective is to compute the largest $t$ such that there is no such solution. In this paper we study the algorithmic complexity of the unbounded subset sum, the Frobenius problem and a generalization of the problems. More precisely, we study pseudo-polynomial time algorithms with a running time that depends on the smallest number $a_0$ or respectively the largest number $a_n$. For the parameter $a_0$, we show that all considered problems are subquadratically equivalent to $(min,+)$-convolution, a fundamental algorithmic problem from the area of fine-grained complexity. By this equivalence, we obtain hardness results for the considered problems (based on the assumption that an algorithm with a subquadratic running time for $(min,+)$-convolution does not exist) as well as algorithms with improved running time. The proof for the equivalence makes use of structural properties of solutions, a technique that was developed in the area of integer programming. In case of the complexity of the problems parameterized by $a_n$, we present improved algorithms. For example we give a quasi linear time algorithm for the Frobenius problem as well as a hardness result based on the strong exponential time hypothesis.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Kim-Manuel Klein. 2021-08-12. On the Fine-Grained Complexity of the Unbounded SubsetSum and the Frobenius Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05581

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗