SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2108.06410

SINA - Smart Interoperability Architecture An architecture fostering the interoperability between smart building technology from different manufacturers and smart grid infrastructure to enable new business models for energy services

Abstract

More and more household appliances connect to the Internet and exchange data freely. This is the foundation for true smart buildings. However, there is still no uniform communication technology available, which can connect all appliances from all vendors. Protocols differ between manufacturers making interoperability difficult or even impossible. Manufacturers cannot rely on a reference for the implementation and real estate developers and operators are reluctant to commit to a system until it is clear which one will prevail. A similar situation is evident in smart grids and applies equally to the energy supply industry. This fragmentation ultimately leads to missed opportunities in terms of business models which could connect customers with service providers. We present a first draft of an architecture: SINA - Smart Interoperability Architecture. SINA is based on existing decentralized infrastructure, which avoids creating a dependency of the market participants on an overpowering service provider. The core element of the technical solution is an open-source module integrated in the private clouds of the manufacturers, energy suppliers and service providers. The architecture addresses problems of data ownership, privacy and data security avoiding central administrative structures. It manages data access and transfer in a decentralized and distributed system. SINA uses a blockchain and smart contracts to make sure that the pieces of information about which data are accessed, by whom they are accessed, how they are processed, and which monetary transactions take place are immutably stored and made available. This allows providers to offer services to users in a transparent and trustworthy manner. Finally, SINA includes a matchmaking block which helps service providers find potential customers and vice versa. This set of features makes SINA unique.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andreas Rumsch, Christoph Imboden, Alberto Calatroni, Martin Camenzind, Edith Birrer, Andrew Paice. 2021-08-13. SINA - Smart Interoperability Architecture An architecture fostering the interoperability between smart building technology from different manufacturers and smart grid infrastructure to enable new business models for energy services. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.06410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Message-Level Scheduling for RLNC-Coded Multi-Source Traffic

This paper studies weighted decoding-delay minimization for multiple RLNC-coded message streams that compete for finite processing capacity at a destination. Packet arrivals are exogenous, while the scheduler only determines the processing order of packets already available at the destination. A trace-conditioned offline scheduling formulation shows that a batch-release subclass is strongly NP-hard even with a single processing unit. Message-Aware Innovation-Deficit Scheduling (MAIDS) is then developed to prioritize each serviceable message according to its weight and remaining decoding deficit. For a single processing unit, MAIDS is shown to be exactly optimal under nonblocking progressive arrivals with equal weights and under common activation with arbitrary positive weights, while the unrestricted weighted online problem admits no universal deterministic $O(1)$ competitive ratio. Simulation results on streaming and batch benchmarks show that MAIDS consistently reduces weighted decoding delay relative to the tested baselines, remains close to the offline optimum on average, and recovers the predicted exact performance boundaries.

cs.NI

The Towers Were Standing: A Cause Decomposition of Cellular Outages During Hurricane Helene

Hurricane Helene produced the largest absolute cell-site outage in the public FCC record, peaking at 4562 sites. The conventional model is physical: towers destroyed. Helene did destroy over 1700 miles of fibre, but almost none of it was cell sites. We present the first cause-decomposed study of the FCC's Disaster Information Reporting System, reconstructing 80 state-days and 580 county-days from 24 daily filings by two reconciled independent extractions. Damage to cell sites is negligible: 1.1% of attributed cell-site-days across six states, at most 3.8% anywhere. The sites were standing. What took them out divides by terrain: pooled, power dominates at 63.2%, but in mountainous North Carolina severed transport (backhaul) reaches 52.2% against 47.3%, and in Tennessee 69.9%. North Carolina's transport share rises from 7.0% to 85.0% across the event (\r{ho} = 0.92). Seventeen days after landfall, on 15 October, 47 sites lost transport across six contiguous North Carolina counties with no rainfall, no power loss, no damage, and recovery by the next report. Independent active-probe measurement corroborates it: responsive /24s fall 1.02% for twelve hours while Tennessee stays flat. We release the dataset. Backup power is the standard resilience investment; here it addresses the smaller half of the problem.

cs.NI

terms.txt: A Consent and Compensation Protocol for Agentic Web Access

The open web ran on an unwritten bargain: sites admitted crawlers, and search engines sent visitors back. Public measurements show that bargain breaking under AI crawlers and agents. Automated clients now make up most requests, training dominates Cloudflare-classified crawling, and the largest AI platforms fetch thousands of pages for each visitor they return. The web's common control, robots.txt, cannot express identity, purpose, terms, or price, can be circumvented, and newer alternatives are largely proprietary CDN features. We specify terms.txt, a robots.txt-style file for per-path, per-purpose machine-access terms, plus an origin-enforced exchange using Web Bot Auth signatures, signed intent, delegation tokens, HTTP 402 negotiation, and signed receipts. We define what the exchange can enforce, audit, and leave to contract. A dependency-free implementation adds 0.20 to 0.65 ms per request on one vCPU.

cs.NI