Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.07393

Theory Building in Geometry Education: Designing and implementing a course for 12-15 year old students

Madhav Kaushish
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

If we want mathematics education to be valuable to everybody, including those who do not pursue mathematics-related careers, we need to use mathematics as a training ground for certain ways of thinking. This dissertation focuses on one aspect of mathematical thinking, namely theory building. It has three parts - unpacking what constitutes theory building, the development of a course aimed at theory building, and a qualitative description of an implementation of that course with 12 to 15-year-old students in two schools in Pune, India. The description aims to understand some of how students engaged with the course and the role of the instructor in the implementation of the course. The data used in this description includes video recordings of the sessions, teacher reflections at the end of each session, and student reflections and feedback. The ultimate goal of the description is to suggest considerations we should keep in mind when designing and implementing theory-building courses. The focus of the dissertation is within mathematics, and more specifically, within geometry. However, this is hopefully just a first step towards a transdisciplinary framework aimed at developing thinking abilities useful to everybody in their personal, public, and professional lives.

Explore related subjects

math.HO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Madhav Kaushish. 2021-08-17. Theory Building in Geometry Education: Designing and implementing a course for 12-15 year old students. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO↗
arXiv2026

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO↗