SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2108.07551

A heuristic for listing almost-clique minimal separators of a graph

Abstract

Bodlaender and Koster (Discrete Mathematics 2006) introduced the notion of almost-clique separators in the context of computing the treewidth $\tw(G)$ of a given graph $G$. A separator $S \subseteq V(G)$ of $G$ is an \emph{almost-clique separator} if $S \setminus \{v\}$ is a clique of $G$ for some $v \in S$. $S$ is a \emph{minimal separator} if $S$ has at least two full components, where a full component of $S$ is a connected component $C$ of $G \setminus S$ such that $N_G(C) = S$. They observed that if $S$ is an almost-clique minimal separator of $G$ then $\tw(G \cup K(S)) = \tw(G)$, where $K(S)$ is the complete graph on vertex set $S$: in words, filling an almost-clique minimal separator into a clique does not increase the treewidth. Based on this observation, they proposed a preprocessing method for treewidth computation, a fundamental step of which is to find a preferably maximal set of pairwise non-crossing almost-clique minimal separators of a graph. In this paper, we present a heuristic for this step, which is based on the following empirical observation. For graph $G$ and a minimal triangulation $H$ of $G$, let $\QQ(H, G)$ denote the set of all almost-clique minimal separators of $G$ that are minimal separators of $H$. Note that since the minimal separators of $H$ are pairwise non-crossing, so are those in $\QQ(H, G)$. We observe from experiments that $\QQ(H, G)$ is remarkably close to maximal, especially when the minimal triangulation $H$ is computed by an algorithm aiming for small treewidth. This observation leads to an efficient implementation of the preprocessing method proposed by Bodlaender and Koster. Experiments on instances from PACE 2017 and other sources show that this implementation is extremely fast and effective for graphs of practical interest.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hisao Tamaki. 2021-08-17. A heuristic for listing almost-clique minimal separators of a graph. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS