Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.07945

A Tighter Relation Between Hereditary Discrepancy and Determinant Lower Bound

Haotian Jiang·Victor Reis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In seminal work, Lov\'asz, Spencer, and Vesztergombi [European J. Combin., 1986] proved a lower bound for the hereditary discrepancy of a matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ in terms of the maximum $|\det(B)|^{1/k}$ over all $k \times k$ submatrices $B$ of $A$. We show algorithmically that this determinant lower bound can be off by at most a factor of $O(\sqrt{\log (m) \cdot \log (n)})$, improving over the previous bound of $O(\log(mn) \cdot \sqrt{\log (n)})$ given by Matou\v{s}ek [Proc. of the AMS, 2013]. Our result immediately implies $\mathrm{herdisc}(\mathcal{F}_1 \cup \mathcal{F}_2) \leq O(\sqrt{\log (m) \cdot \log (n)}) \cdot \max(\mathrm{herdisc}(\mathcal{F}_1), \mathrm{herdisc}(\mathcal{F}_2))$, for any two set systems $\mathcal{F}_1, \mathcal{F}_2$ over $[n]$ satisfying $|\mathcal{F}_1 \cup \mathcal{F}_2| = m$. Our bounds are tight up to constants when $m = O(\mathrm{poly}(n))$ due to a construction of P\'alv\"olgyi [Discrete Comput. Geom., 2010] or the counterexample to Beck's three permutation conjecture by Newman, Neiman and Nikolov [FOCS, 2012].

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Haotian Jiang, Victor Reis. 2021-08-18. A Tighter Relation Between Hereditary Discrepancy and Determinant Lower Bound. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07945

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗