Angular Velocity Estimation using Non-coplanar Accelerometer Array

Michael Maynard; Vishesh Vikas

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.09834

Angular Velocity Estimation using Non-coplanar Accelerometer Array

Michael Maynard·Vishesh Vikas

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Over the last few decades, Gyro-Free IMUs have been extensively researched to overcome the limitations of gyroscopes. This research presents a Non-coplanar Accelerometer Array (NAA) for estimating angular velocity with non-specific geometric arrangement of four or more triaxial accelerometers with non-coplanarity constraint. The presented proof of non-coplanar spacial arrangement also provides insights into propagation of the sensor noise and construction of the noise covariance matrices. The system noise depends on the singular values of the relative displacement matrix (between the sensors). A dynamical system model with uncorrelated process and measurement noise is proposed where the accelerometer readings are used simultaneously as process and measurement inputs. The angular velocity is estimated using an EKF that discretizes and linearizes the continuous-discrete time dynamical system. The simulations are performed on a Cube-NAA (Cu-NAA) comprising four accelerometers placed at different vertices of a cube. They analyze the estimation error for static and dynamic movement as the distance between the accelerometers is varied. Here, the system noise is observed to decrease inversely with the length of the cube edge as the arrangement is kept identical. Consequently, the simulation results indicate asymptotic decrease in the standard error of estimation with edge length. The experiments are conducted on a Cu-NAA with five reflective optical markers. The reflective markers are visually tracked using VICON to construct the ground truth. This unique experimental setup, apart from providing three degrees of rotational freedom of movement, also allows for three degrees of spacial translation (linear acceleration of the Cu-NAA in space). The simulation and experimental results indicate better performance of the proposed EKF as compared to one with correlated process and measurement noises.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Michael Maynard, Vishesh Vikas. 2021-08-22. Angular Velocity Estimation using Non-coplanar Accelerometer Array. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09834

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗