Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2108.10054

Remote Sensing and Machine Learning for Food Crop Production Data in Africa Post-COVID-19

Racine Ly·Khadim Dia·Mariam Diallo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the agricultural sector, the COVID-19 threatens to lead to a severe food security crisis in the region, with disruptions in the food supply chain and agricultural production expected to contract between 2.6% and 7%. From the food crop production side, the travel bans and border closures, the late reception and the use of agricultural inputs such as imported seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides could lead to poor food crop production performances. Another layer of disruption introduced by the mobility restriction measures is the scarcity of agricultural workers, mainly seasonal workers. The lockdown measures and border closures limit seasonal workers' availability to get to the farm on time for planting and harvesting activities. Moreover, most of the imported agricultural inputs travel by air, which the pandemic has heavily impacted. Such transportation disruptions can also negatively affect the food crop production system. This chapter assesses food crop production levels in 2020 -- before the harvesting period -- in all African regions and four staples such as maize, cassava, rice, and wheat. The production levels are predicted using the combination of biogeophysical remote sensing data retrieved from satellite images and machine learning artificial neural networks (ANNs) technique. The remote sensing products are used as input variables and the ANNs as the predictive modeling framework. The input remote sensing products are the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the daytime Land Surface Temperature (LST), rainfall data, and agricultural lands' Evapotranspiration (ET). The output maps and data are made publicly available on a web-based platform, AAgWa (Africa Agriculture Watch, www.aagwa.org), to facilitate access to such information to policymakers, deciders, and other stakeholders.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Racine Ly, Khadim Dia, Mariam Diallo. 2021-07-14. Remote Sensing and Machine Learning for Food Crop Production Data in Africa Post-COVID-19. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10054

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗