SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2109.00569

Interpretable Fields in Various Valued Fields

Abstract

Let $\mathcal{K}=(K,v,\ldots)$ be a dp-minimal expansion of a non-trivially valued field of characteristic $0$ and $\mathcal{F}$ an infinite field interpretable in $\mathcal{K}$. Assume that $\mathcal{K}$ is one of the following: (i) $V$-minimal, (ii) power bounded $T$-convex, or (iii) $P$-minimal (assuming additionally in (iii) generic differentiability of definable functions). Then $\mathcal{F}$ is definably isomorphic to a finite extension $K$ or, in cases (i) and (ii), its residue field. In particular, every infinite field interpretable in $\mathbb{Q}_p$ is definably isomorphic to a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_p$, answering a question of Pillay's. Using Johnson's work on dp-minimal fields and the machinery developed here, we conclude that if $\mathcal{K}$ is an infinite dp-minimal pure field then every field definable in $\mathcal{K}$ is definably isomorphic to a finite extension of $K$. The proof avoids elimination of imaginaries in $\mathcal{K}$ replacing it with a reduction of the problem to certain distinguished quotients of $K$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yatir Halevi, Assaf Hasson, Ya'acov Peterzil. 2021-09-01. Interpretable Fields in Various Valued Fields. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00569

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO