Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.01065

Congruence Filter Pairs, Adjoints and Leibniz Hierarchy

Peter Arndt·Hugo Luiz Mariano·Darllan Conceição Pinto
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We review the notion of (finitary) filter pair as a tool for creating and analyzing logics. A filter pair can be seen as a presentation of a logic, given by presenting its lattice of theories as the image of a lattice homomorphism, with certain properties ensuring that the resulting logic is finitary and substitution invariant. Every finitary, substitution invariant logic arises from a filter pair. Particular classes of logics can be characterized as arising from special classes of filter pairs. We consider so-called congruence filter pairs, i.e. filter pairs for which the domain of the lattice homomorphism is a lattice of congruences for some quasivariety. We show that the class of logics admitting a presentation by such a filter pair is exactly the class of logics having an algebraic semantics. We study the properties of a certain Galois connection coming with such filter pairs. We give criteria for a congruence filter pair to present a logic in some classes of the Leibniz hierarchy by means of this Galois connection, and its interplay with the Leibniz operator. As an application, we show a bridge theorem, stating that the amalgamation property implies the Craig interpolation property, for a certain class of logics including non-protoalgebraic logics.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Peter Arndt, Hugo Luiz Mariano, Darllan Conceição Pinto. 2021-09-02. Congruence Filter Pairs, Adjoints and Leibniz Hierarchy. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01065

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗