Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2109.01792

On symplectic capacities and their blind spots

Ely Kerman·Yuanpu Liang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we settle three basic questions concerning the Gutt-Hutchings capacities. Our primary result settles a version of the recognition question in the negative. We prove that the Gutt-Hutchings capacities together with the volume, do not constitute a complete set of symplectic invariants for star-shaped domains with smooth boundary. We also establish two independence properties. We prove that, even for star-shaped domains with smooth boundaries, these capacities are independent from the volume. We also prove that the capacities are mutually independent by constructing, for any $j \in \mathbb{N}$, a family of star-shaped domains, with smooth boundary and the same volume, whose capacities are all equal but the $j^{th}$. The constructions underlying these results are not exotic. They are convex and concave toric domains. A key to the progress made here is a significant simplification of the formulae of Gutt and Hutchings for the capacities of such domains which holds under an additional symmetry assumption. This simplification allows us to identify new blind spots of the capacities which are used to construct the desired examples.

Explore related subjects

math.SG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ely Kerman, Yuanpu Liang. 2021-09-04. On symplectic capacities and their blind spots. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.01792

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Extended Future Tube Conjecture for Unipotent Subgroups

Let $\Omega$ be the Lorentz future cone in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$ with respect to the Lorentz product and let $T^M$ be the $M$-fold product of the future tube $T=\mathbb{R}^{d+1}+i\Omega$. The Lorentz group $\mathrm{SO}_0(1,d)$ acts diagonally on $T^M$, and its complexification $\mathrm{SO}(1,d)^\mathbb{C}$ acts on $\mathbb{C}^{(d+1)\times M}$. We prove that the domain $G^\mathbb{C}\cdot T^M$ is a Stein manifold for any connected unipotent subgroup $G$ of $\mathrm{SO}_0(1,d)$.

math.SG↗
arXiv2026

The First Correction Term in the Asymptotic Expansion of Bohr--Sommerfeld Lagrangian States

Let $\Lambda$ be a compact Bohr--Sommerfeld Lagrangian submanifold of a compact K\"ahler manifold equipped with a holomorphic prequantum line bundle. We study the asymptotic expansion of the Lagrangian states associated with $\Lambda$. In particular, we compute explicitly the first nontrivial correction term and show that it is expressed in terms of geometric invariants of the ambient K\"ahler manifold and the Lagrangian submanifold, including their scalar curvatures, the second fundamental form, and the mean curvature. As a consequence, we obtain the corresponding second-order asymptotic formula for the $L^2$-norm of the Lagrangian states.

math.SG↗
arXiv2026

Classification of Legendrian doubles and suspensions

We define a construction of Legendrians inside contact manifolds that arise by doubling an exact Lagrangian filling in the page of an open book decomposition. This can be seen as a generalization of a previous construction by Courte and Ekholm to arbitrary open books. These Legendrians, called Legendrian doubles, are shown to admit regular flexible exact Lagrangian fillings, and they are thus classified up to Legendrian isotopy by classical data. Finally, we show that the Legendrian suspension construction, as defined by Arikan and the author in previous work,-this is a Legendrian contained inside a page of an open book that is obtained by using Seidel's suspension of Lefschetz fibrations- is a Legendrian double.

math.SG↗